What stood out most to me in Marc Prensky's article
were his points regarding the "digital natives" and the "digital
immigrants." I never gave it much thought until now, that students
currently in the USA have all grown up with technology. They are, or can
be almost fully immersed in it, compared to generations before. Prensky mentions,
"Today’s average college grads have spent less than 5,000 hours of
their lives reading, but over 10,000 hours playing video games (not to mention
20,000 hours watching TV). Computer games, email, the Internet, cell phones and
instant messaging are integral parts of their lives." This does not
surprise me too much; however I do believe that there are pros and cons with both and that there can be a happy medium between
the two. Therefore, digital immigrants and digital natives should both adapt in different area to discover this. I understand we as a society cannot
restrict growth in certain areas, such as technology, but when is too much of
something counter productive? Too much of something usually has its
concerns as well.
There has been, and there will be more
technological growth in education, and it is our responsibility as teachers to
adjust accordingly to students’ learning style. Teachers must
teach to both the digital immigrants and digital natives as best he/she can.
There will always be students who are at different places and who have
different levels of awareness in the tech world, due to accessibility, social economic
status, etc; therefore, we must be familiar and able to relate to students at either end of
the spectrum.